By Norm Frauenheim-
Pound-for-pound, it might be the most overrated argument in the debate business. Who is No. 1? Who’s No. 2? Who cares? Most of these guys won’t fight each other any way. But it’s still a way to fill the dead time and there’s been plenty of that since the top of the argument, Roman Gonzalez, lost a controversial decision.
In a subsequent rush, ratings have been re-evaluated and redone. Everybody seems to have a new No. 1 and it’s not Gonzalez. No surprise there, although it seems unfair to end Gonzalez’ unprecedented reign after a decision roundly ripped by the same people who run the various rankings.
To rip Gonzalez’ loss to Thailand’s Srisaket Sor Rungvisai as a scorecard robbery and then to yank him from the top spot only seems to compound the crime. It’s as if Nicaraguan – the smallest fighter to ever occupy No. 1 — was only there for as long as it took to sort out a noisy version of musical chairs.
Gennady Golovkin is No. 1 in some. Andre Ward is favored in others. Prodigy Vasyl Lomachenko gets the nod in a few. But, come on, shouldn’t No. 1 just be left vacant? That’s the choice here. Nobody has really made a decisive claim on the spot that Floyd Mayweather Jr. once owned.
I understand why Gonzalez is no longer atop the debate. For him, the trend has been problematic. The flyweight great has struggled at junior-bantamweight. But there’d be no argument here or anywhere else if the decision March 18 had gone his way at Madison Square Garden a couple of weeks ago when he got up from a first-round knockdown. Gonzales was the Lord of the Flies when he ascended to No. 1 when Mayweather retired. Yet with one lousy loss, his pound-for-pound run suddenly has a fly’s life span??? In fairness to him and his still-dynamic skillset, it’s reasonable to vacate the spot and give him a chance to regain it in a Rungvisai rematch that would be judged alongside performances delivered by GGG, Ward, Lomachenko and few others.
GGG remains unbeaten, yet his recent performances against Kell Brook and then Danny Jacobs, also at Madison Square Garden a couple of weeks ago, left questions, not unlike those asked about Gonzalez.
GGG is considered a small middleweight. He looked as if he often struggled in winning a decision against a bigger Jacobs. Can he adjust? He might have to against a bigger Canelo Alvarez. If – if, if, if — there is a GGG-Canelo fight in September, it’ll be one piece in the pound-for-pound puzzle.
Another one would be Ward-versus-Sergey Kovalev in a rematch, possibly on June 17. Ward won a decision over Kovalev in November. It was unanimous on the scorecards and unanimously controversial among fans. It was 114-113 on all three cards. Had two of the judges scored it for Kovalev instead, the Russian would be the undisputed No. 1. Instead, there’s Ward, the pick in some ratings despite suffering a second-round knockdown. Like Gonzalez, Kovalev deserves a rematch in a sequel with more pound-for-pound implications now than there were in November.
Then, there’s Lomachenko. He’s the provocative pick for No. 1. Publicists and writers, alike, portray the two time Olympic gold medalist from the Ukraine like a magician, Houdini in boxing gloves. Maybe, but Houdini’s pro resume is hard to judge. He only has eight bouts, including a loss to Orlando Salido.
Lomachenko is intriguing. But his pound-for-pound credentials are still to be tested, perhaps by Mikey Garcia, who has 28 more fights and no losses on a record that represents just another compelling reason for a vacancy at the top of this pound-for-pound debate.
