NEW YORK (September 4, 2011)—THIS THURSDAY at Club 1849 in New York City, Havoc Boxing Promotions will stage the Final Press conference for a championship night of boxing that will take place just two nights later on Saturday night September 10th at the Aviator Sports Complex in Brooklyn.
Many of the fighters who will appear on the card will be present at the Press Conference and will be available for interviews and photo opportunities.
In the main event, undefeated Super Middleweight Joel Castillo will see action in an eight round bout.
Fans can also witness the American debut of Colombian Cruiserweight knockout artist in undefeated Santander Silgado.
In a ten round female world championship, Amanda Serrano will vie for the IBF Super Featherweight title against Kimberly Connor
LUNCH AND BEVERAGE WILL BE SERVED TO THE MEDIA
WHO: Joel Castillo (9-0, 6 KO’s) –Undefeated Super Middleweight—Bronx, NY
Santander Silgado (18-0, 16 KO’s)—Cruiserweight Sensation—Colombia
Amanda Serrano (10-0-1)—Undefeated world title challenger—Brooklyn, NY
Anthony Irons (3-0-1, 2 KO’s)—Undefeated Welterweight—Brooklyn, NY
Denis “Da Mama’s Boy” Douglin (13-1, 8 KO’s)—Jr. Middleweight—Marlboro, NJ
Ryan Ramaya (Pro Debut)–Featherweight—Brooklyn, NY
Zachary Ochoa (PD)—Jr. Welterweright—Brooklyn, NY
Arman Mrkanovic (1-1)—Cruiserweight—Queens, NY
Frank Galarza (3-0, 1 KO)—Jr. Welterweight—Brooklyn, NY
Rob Diaz—CEO of Havoc Boxing Promotions
WHAT: FINAL Press Conference in conjunction with Havoc Boxing H4 that will take place on Saturday September 10th at The Aviator Sports Complex in Brooklyn, NY
WHEN: Thursday September 8th, 2011 at 1pm eastern
WHERE: CLUB 1849
183 Bleecker St
New York, NY 10012
All tickets are priced at $50 and can be purchased by clicking:
www.havocboxingnyc.com
The Aviator Sports Complex is located at:
3159 Flatbush Ave – Brooklyn, N.Y. 11234
For more information on Havoc Boxing, Click:
www.havocboxingnyc.com
THE COURT CONFIRMS THE FINE OF 500 000 IMPOSED ON ACTIVISION BLIZZARD FOR ITS PARTICIPATION IN ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS IN THE MARKET FOR NINTENDO GAMES CONSOLES AND GAMES CARTRIDGES.
States News Service February 10, 2011 BRUSSELS — The following information was released by the European Union:
By decision of 30 October 20021, the Commission imposed fines on Nintendo and some of its distributors for their participation in a complex of agreements and concerted practices in the markets for Nintendo games consoles and games cartridges. The decision concerns Nintendo and seven exclusive distributors of Nintendo products: John Menzies plc (United Kingdom); Concentra – Produtos para crianE*as SA (Portugal); Linea GIG SpA (Italy); Bergsala AB (Sweden); Itochu Hellas, the wholly-owned Greek subsidiary of Itochu Corporation, a Japanese undertaking; Nortec AE (Greece); and Activision Blizzard Germany GmbH, formerly CD-Contact Data GmbH (Belgium and Luxembourg). bestnintendodsgamesnow.com best nintendo ds games
Those agreements were designed to restrict parallel trade, that is to say, exports from one country to another by parallel distribution channels.
The Commission found that the conduct of those undertakings, in the period from 1991 to 1997, was contrary to EU law and imposed fines totalling 167.843 million. Activision Blizzard was fined 1 million.
By judgment of 30 April 20092, the Court of First Instance varied the Commission’s decision inasmuch as that decision had not granted Activision Blizzard the benefit of the attenuating circumstance of its exclusively passive role in the infringement and, consequently, reduced the fine imposed on that company to 500 000. On the other hand, the Court of First Instance dismissed the application for annulment of the Commission’s decision.
Activision Blizzard appealed to the Court of Justice against that judgment of the Court of First Instance.
By the judgment delivered today, the Court concludes, following an examination of the arguments put forward by Activision Blizzard in support of its appeal, that the Court of First Instance did not err in law when it dismissed the application for annulment of the Commission’s decision.
The Court holds that the Court of First Instance neither distorted the evidence nor made a manifest error of assessment in finding that the documents relied on by the Commission constituted sufficient evidence of the existence of an agreement between Activision Blizzard and Nintendo which was contrary to EU law. The Court holds, furthermore, that sufficient reasons were stated for the judgment under appeal to enable Activision Blizzard to know the reasons which led the Court of First Instance to conclude that it had participated in an agreement with the object of restricting parallel trade and to enable the Court of Justice to review that judgment. in our site best nintendo ds games
Consequently, the Court dismisses the appeal.
1Decision 2003/675/EC relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/35.587 PO Video Games, COMP/35.706 PO Nintendo Distribution and COMP/36.321 Omega – Nintendo) (OJ 2003 L 255, p. 33).
2Case T-18/03 CD-Contact Data v Commission; see also Press Release 40/09 .
NOTE: An action for annulment seeks the annulment of acts of the institutions of the European Union that are contrary to European Union law. The Member States, the European institutions and individuals may, under certain conditions, bring an action for annulment before the Court of Justice or the General Court. If the action is well founded, the act is annulled. The institution concerned must fill any legal vacuum created by the annulment of the act.
